Skip to main content

The Black Sea Theatre (part 1): Introduction

When thinking about the Diplomacy board you may think of dividing it into zones. A traditional division is to split the board into two parts: the Northern (or Western) Triangle, featuring England, France and Germany, and the Southern (Eastern) Triangle of Russia, Austria-Hungary and Turkey.

This isn't a clean division. Italy doesn't really fit into either Triangle, and only gets involved depending on how she opens. Russia sits on the dividing line and can't afford to ignore the north or the south.

There's nothing wrong with this consideration; it is useful to focus your attention. And, if you are considering long-term strategy knowing the stalemate lines that split the board is an advantage.

Personally, though, I prefer to narrow down the areas of the board and consider the possibilities there. I therefore have a number of 'theatres' that I consider, and the Black Sea Theatre is one of them.
The Black Sea Zone
The first thing to mention about this zone is that it involves the three regional powers Russia, Turkey and Austria-Hungary. Italy can become involved quickly enough, with the right moves, but only if Austria or Turkey allow it.

The other thing to say is that the Aegean Sea is that the area of sea in the top right of the image is a space which no power can move into. It is the Caspian Sea but it isn't named on the board, so you can't move there.

Unsurprisingly, the Black Sea is central to this theatre. It is a very important space. Not only is it surrounded by five SCs (and Armenia) but it is a defining space in the relationship between Turkey and Russia. It doesn't take much, does it, to imagine how both these powers might want to move their fleets there?

There are two other sea spaces. The Aegean Sea is named and has a marginal inclusion on the zone, simply because it has such an impact on Constantinople and Smyrna. The other sea space, at the bottom of the image, is the Eastern Mediterranean Sea, and it doesn't affect the zone usually.

The image features some unnamed land spaces:
  • Syria is the southern-most of Turkey's spaces, and isn't part of the zone in other than exceptional circumstances.
  • Moscow is north of Sevastopol, a Russian SC hosting an army. It can become involved.
  • Warsaw is north-west of Ukraine, another Russian, army-hosting SC.
  • Galicia is north of Budapest, an Austrian space which is a non-SC but within the zone.
  • Serbia is directly west of Bulgaria, and not involved; a neutral space.
  • Greece is in the south-east corner of the image, a neutral SC but not involved.
Not surprisingly, the Black Sea itself is the key space in the zone. However, depending upon the alliance structure in the theatre, Armenia, Bulgaria, and Rumania may be just as important.
Heathley Baines (Nibbler)
Editor

The Series "The Black Sea Theatre"
Part 1: "Introduction"
Part 2: "The Super Fleet"
Part 3: "Turkey"
Part 4: "Russia"
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Powers: England (part 1): Introduction

England is one of the powers that doesn't often raise a lot of enthusiasm among players if they draw her in the game.  This is mainly because, while it is a power that can do well enough, being in an highly defensible position and therefore a power that is likely to keep a decent player in the game until the end, it is one of the more difficult powers to win a game with. In short, she's seen as 'boring'. Well, no power in Diplomacy should be boring to play; you're doing something wrong if this is the case. And England is just as good a prospect to win the game as any other power. Just think outside the box. In this series of posts, I'll be looking at England's position on the board, her opening strategies, her potential alliances, and a strategy that can lead to victory for the English player. https://assets2.hrc.org/ But first, let's look at how the history of Britain may well give some clues to playing England in Diplomacy. Wait - that...
Post a Comment
Read more

How to Play Diplomacy (part 1): Introduction

Diplomacy is a complicated game. Now, there's an understatement! However, when learning how to play it, there is one source which can't be ignored: the creator of the game, Allan B Calhamer. Allan B Calhamer (7 Dec 1931 - 25 Feb 2013) https://haroonriaz.files.wordpress.com/ Having had a break from the blog for a while, thinking about what I wanted to write next and recovering properly from a broken femur, I have decided to come back with a series of articles on playing Diplomacy , but playing it properly. Rather than tips, hints, strategy discussions, etc (there're plenty of those elsewhere on the blog), this is about playing the game the way it was meant to be played. Now, I'll readily admit that this is my opinion. There is always going to be discussion about the way the game ought to be played. I don't claim there's a definitive answer to every aspect of the game, and the way you play is - or should be - somewhat defined by the context in which a ...
Post a Comment
Read more

How to Play Diplomacy (part 2): Origins

Diplomacy  is a complicated game.  Now,  there's  an understatement! However, when learning how to play it, there is one source which can't be ignored: the creator of the game, Allan B Calhamer. http://hybridsrising.com/ In the Diplomacy Archive , there are two articles which deal with how Diplomacy came into being: A Dozen Years of Diplomacy  (1966; First published in Diplomania, issue 12, Aug 1966.) The Invention of Diplomacy  (1974; First published in Games ad Puzzles, issue 21, Jan 1974.) Both articles explain the forces that led to Calhamer creating  Diplomacy and they are, pretty much, repetitive of each other. Although they explain how the game was formed, they also have implications on how Calhamer intended the game to be played. The Influences From A Dozen Years of Diplomacy : At the end of World War II, I came across an article on "post-war planning" which reviewed the European diplomacy of the period 1815-1914 and...
Post a Comment
Read more