Rules for Publishing

General Rules

Only posts which relate to the game Diplomacy or its variants are allowed.
Contributions are accepted from anyone who plays Diplomacy, whether online or not. This means I will accept contributions from players on any website. There should be no antagonistic comments or language aimed at any website.
Respect is expected. Posts or comments which are personally abusive towards any contributor will be edited or removed. Respect the person, if not the content.
Posts should be accessible in regard to the language used to all readers. Whilst profanity is not banned, post titles containing profanity are not allowed. No adult content is allowed.
Posts or comments containing racist, genderist, are hateful towards sexual orientation, or feature any other hateful sentiment, are not allowed.

Posting about games

As most sites do not allow questions, comments or discussion about on-going games, posts or comments featuring these games are not allowed.
Commentaries about finished games are allowed. However, due to data protection, player names or pseudonyms should not be used; instead, use the names of the power played.
Direct quotations from games are only allowed in context.

The Administrator (editor) of the site reserves the right to edit, remove or prevent the posting of any post or comment, regardless of the consent of the author.

An author has the right to request the removal of a post should s/he wish.

The Administrator (editor) of the site reserves the right to restrict access to the site of any person breaking the site's rules.

The Administrator (editor) of the site reserves the right to change the site rules at any time.

Comments

Across the Board

Across the Board is a blog about playing the game Diplomacy online. A representation of the Diplomacy board at the start of the game. The game of Diplomacy is a game of deception. It is based in the pre-WWI era; each of the seven players, representing seven major powers, compete to dominate Europe. It is won when one player owns the majority of the supply centres on the board. Well, that's about as simple an explanation as can be expressed. What I haven't talked about is the skills required: persuasion, manipulation of players, strategy, and honesty and deceit in (approximately) equal measures. It's a highly skilled game with (generally) simple rules. It isn't a war game, although it looks like one and the pieces are military units, armies and fleets. It's a game about diplomacy, about getting your opponents to help you win. Yes, "about getting your opponents to help you win". You read that right. You're facing six other players,...

How to Play Diplomacy (part 3): Corrections

Diplomacy is a complicated game. Now, there's an understatement! However, when learning how to play it, there is one source which can't be ignored: the creator of the game, Allan B Calhamer. http://englishharmony.com/ Calhamer's article Objectives other than Winning (first published in IDA Diplomacy Handbook, 1974) was mainly written to correct the aberrant ideas about scoring systems in Diplomacy. The system he was writing mainly about is known as the 'Strong Second' system, but it also tells us about play when any scoring system is being used. Calhamer's Design Diplomacy was designed to be played as a one-off event. It was designed to be played face-to-face, around a table with all players present at the board. As such, when the Hobby diversified with play-by-mail games, then play-by-email and websites, as well as when it was played as a tournament or league, the game became something different. Setting the game in these scenarios makes ga...

They Don't Like It Up 'Em! (part 2): When All Else Fails

There are some things to remember that help you play Diplomacy better. Some of them are tactical, some of them strategic; some are about the way you communicate, or negotiate. Very few of these things are a collective of everything to do with Dip. Knowing how to take action to prevent defeat, and knowing when to carry home your advantage, are two of these. https://memegenerator.net/ When all else fails Sometimes aggression has to be answered with aggression, even if it's passive aggression. There are two ways to do this. On the board: Here, you're going to throw everything at your aggressor. Forget about what's going on elsewhere on the board - it doesn't matter now. Perhaps you are going to lose out by being pig-headed in full-on defence or counter-attacking. But that's the point of it: your oppressor has to see that what she's doing is costing you - and by extension - her. You're on the way out, anyway. Off the board:...

Across the Board

Search This Blog