Skip to main content

Across the Board

Across the Board is a blog about playing the game Diplomacy online.

A representation of the Diplomacy board at the start of the game.

The game of Diplomacy is a game of deception. It is based in the pre-WWI era; each of the seven players, representing seven major powers, compete to dominate Europe. It is won when one player owns the majority of the supply centres on the board.

Well, that's about as simple an explanation as can be expressed. What I haven't talked about is the skills required: persuasion, manipulation of players, strategy, and honesty and deceit in (approximately) equal measures.

It's a highly skilled game with (generally) simple rules. It isn't a war game, although it looks like one and the pieces are military units, armies and fleets. It's a game about diplomacy, about getting your opponents to help you win.

Yes, "about getting your opponents to help you win". You read that right. You're facing six other players, all aiming to win the game; how are you - how is anyone! - going to succeed without the help of others?

Although Diplomacy was designed as a game to be played across a table, between family and friends, over a number of hours, it has since developed into an organised hobby. It is played at tournaments, usually held at conventions; it has a world championship, continental championships, national championships, and regional championships. It is played by email and on websites.

Each form of play has its differences. One of the things a dedicated player will find is that the form in which you are playing affects the way you play.

A regular, face-to-face game between family and friends is very different to a game in a tournament, even though both versions are played face-to-face (f2f). Tournaments feature a number of games, often played over a weekend; games need to finish in time for the tournament to finish on time! And tournament games are scored; this often means that they are played with different objectives from a regular game.

Over the internet (remote play) the game is different again. These games are longer but it is possible to play them to the end. Rather than lasting for hours, they last for months. And you can also play in online tournaments. You'll find that many online games are scored in some way or another, and scoring always has an impact on how players adapt their game play.

This site will mainly focus on playing the game online. There will be other articles, I imagine. One of the topics which interests players, for instance, is scoring in tournaments, and any articles on this subject will have a f2f application.

However, the strategy articles, the discussions, etc, will mainly be about playing the online variant of the game. That is the point of the blog; the reason for writing it.

There are plenty of places to play online. If you aren't involved yet, or are looking for other places to play, simply do a search. You'll find many sites that way.

I play on one site, and you'll find that I mainly feature that site in my writings. However, Across the Board isn't about favouring one site over another. I'm not saying a certain degree of bias won't ever be detected in posts (mine or others) but there won't be any deliberate favouritism. I have rules about that here!

I hope I won't be the only writer involved. I hope others will share their thoughts on this great game. If you're one of them, see the guidelines based on the springboard website to the blog.

That'll do for now.

Any thoughts, comments or expressions of interest are welcome.
Heathley Baines (Nibbler),
Editor.
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

How to Play Diplomacy (part 1): Introduction

Diplomacy is a complicated game. Now, there's an understatement! However, when learning how to play it, there is one source which can't be ignored: the creator of the game, Allan B Calhamer. Allan B Calhamer (7 Dec 1931 - 25 Feb 2013) https://haroonriaz.files.wordpress.com/ Having had a break from the blog for a while, thinking about what I wanted to write next and recovering properly from a broken femur, I have decided to come back with a series of articles on playing Diplomacy , but playing it properly. Rather than tips, hints, strategy discussions, etc (there're plenty of those elsewhere on the blog), this is about playing the game the way it was meant to be played. Now, I'll readily admit that this is my opinion. There is always going to be discussion about the way the game ought to be played. I don't claim there's a definitive answer to every aspect of the game, and the way you play is - or should be - somewhat defined by the context in which a ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Overview of Opening Strategy

There is a lot written about opening strategy in Diplomacy. This isn't, perhaps, surprising; the start of a game is when it can be lost, although not won. https://salesbenchmarkindex.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/08/StrategyTactic_Chart.png Never come across this? Where've you been? The Diplomacy Archive has a section devoted to opening strategy ; each power has it's own section on the Archive, featuring named openings . Richard Sharp's book, The Game of Diplomacy , discusses openings, again under each power's chapter. There are discussions about openings in Playdiplomacy's forum, in the Strategy section . And there's a Wordpress blog devoted to Diplomacy Openings . As you might expect, Wikipedia discusses Diplomacy. WikiBooks has Diplomacy , which has some sketchy ideas.  However, as good as some of these pieces and articles are, they tend to miss the most important aspect about a good opening strategy: the diplomacy. Know Your Enemy It ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Two Fallacies

On the Playdiplomacy forum there are a number of topics about how Diplomacy should be played. There is often no agreement, and neither should there be. Diplomacy is played by people with different takes. Providing the rules of the game are followed, everything's good. Well, to some extent. https://darkjedibrotherhood.nyc3.digitaloceanspaces.com/assets/assets/000/000/678/original/keep-calm-and-play-the-game-10.png?1407803848 Personally, I think some of the philosophies behind how players act in a game are flawed. There is enough guidance out there, from the rules of the Diplomacy   to articles by the game's creator Allan B Calhamer , to show how the game ought to be played. The Rules "Object of the Game As soon as one Great Power controls 18 supply centers, it is considered to have gained control of Europe. The player representing that Great Power is the winner. However, players can end the game by agreement before a winner is determined. In this case...
Post a Comment
Read more