Skip to main content

They Don't Like It Up 'Em! (part 1): The Wrong End of the Bayonet

There are some things to remember that help you play Diplomacy better. Some of them are tactical, some of them strategic; some are about the way you communicate, or negotiate.

Very few of these things are a collective of everything to do with Dip. Knowing how to take action to prevent defeat, and knowing when to carry home your advantage, are two of these.

Any excuse to get a belly button on the blog. www.artistshot.com/
There are times when you'll find yourself in the position of having a Diplomacy opponent who is being very aggressive towards you. Unfortunately, this might be by being nasty; even in a game like Dip there are still those idiots who think being online is a free pass to let out the abusive side of their natures.

More often it will be part of the game. They're able to press you relentlessly and they intend to take it. There's nothing wrong with this; it is part of the game. It's a tactic that enables the aggressor to grow and which means that an opponent - you - can be eliminated.

Hopefully, there will be times when you're the one in this position of power. At this point, you need to decide what you want to do: do you want the power eliminated, or do you need her to stay around? What is the best for you in the game?

The Wrong End of the Bayonet

You've erred. Your neighbour is eating his way into your empire. You didn't see the stab coming (or, even worse, you did see the potential but you looked the other way); you were - are - caught up in a conflict with another power, and you can't disengage safely. What can you do?

Frankly, not much. And that's the point; if there was something you could do, you wouldn't be in this position, would you?

What remains, then, is diplomacy. You should have laid the foundations for this situation a while ago. You should have made the early communications you need to build on now. You did, didn't you?

What am I talking about? OK, look here and you'll get the idea, I hope.

Recognise your position...

Begging isn't something that anyone should be proud of doing, so let's call it pleading. Essentially, this is what you'll be doing. You'll wrap it up in strategic discussion, but everyone will know the truth - you're in trouble and you need their help.

If you try to negotiate with anyone, at this point, and try to hide the position you're in, you'll get nowhere. Try to pretend that you're in control of everything, try to bluster, and they'll be laughing at you behind their keyboard.

So be honest, with yourself and with others. You're in deep shit and you need help getting out of it.

... But sell what you can offer

Being weak isn't the same as being useless. Whoever you approach to help you, you need to find something that interests them about keeping you alive. You won't be able to offer it now, perhaps, but - should you remain in the game - you will be able to offer it in the near future.

The word 'near' is important. Why should anyone be willing to keep you around if they have to wait more than a game year or (at most) two to get something back from you? A lengthy wait for some reward is potentially useless. By that point, they may not need anything from you.

Don't ignore your oppressor

Talk, too, to the player attacking you. It is so easy to stop doing this, but it's important that you don't. It may seem futile but it is important.

You need to point out what you can do if she were to let you survive. Whatever you tell her, it has to be better than what she can gain from eliminating you.

You need to point out the danger is continuing to attack you. Is she leaving herself open to attacks from others? Is she letting someone else make progress by targeting you? Are others going to get as much from your collapse as she is?

Don't threaten, not at this point. That will come later. For now, you're selling the advantage of you being her vassal, or warning of what is happening as a result of her continuing aggression.

Oh, and it doesn't matter whether you actually mean what you say. You do need to make her believe that you mean what you say, especially when making promises. But that's the essence of diplomacy anyway... especially in Diplomacy.

I'll write more about this is further posts.
Heathley Baines (Nibbler)
Editor

The Series "They Don't Like It Up 'Em!"
Part 1: "The Wrong End of the Bayonet"
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Overview of Opening Strategy

There is a lot written about opening strategy in Diplomacy. This isn't, perhaps, surprising; the start of a game is when it can be lost, although not won. https://salesbenchmarkindex.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/08/StrategyTactic_Chart.png Never come across this? Where've you been? The Diplomacy Archive has a section devoted to opening strategy ; each power has it's own section on the Archive, featuring named openings . Richard Sharp's book, The Game of Diplomacy , discusses openings, again under each power's chapter. There are discussions about openings in Playdiplomacy's forum, in the Strategy section . And there's a Wordpress blog devoted to Diplomacy Openings . As you might expect, Wikipedia discusses Diplomacy. WikiBooks has Diplomacy , which has some sketchy ideas.  However, as good as some of these pieces and articles are, they tend to miss the most important aspect about a good opening strategy: the diplomacy. Know Your Enemy It ...
Post a Comment
Read more

How to Play Diplomacy (part 1): Introduction

Diplomacy is a complicated game. Now, there's an understatement! However, when learning how to play it, there is one source which can't be ignored: the creator of the game, Allan B Calhamer. Allan B Calhamer (7 Dec 1931 - 25 Feb 2013) https://haroonriaz.files.wordpress.com/ Having had a break from the blog for a while, thinking about what I wanted to write next and recovering properly from a broken femur, I have decided to come back with a series of articles on playing Diplomacy , but playing it properly. Rather than tips, hints, strategy discussions, etc (there're plenty of those elsewhere on the blog), this is about playing the game the way it was meant to be played. Now, I'll readily admit that this is my opinion. There is always going to be discussion about the way the game ought to be played. I don't claim there's a definitive answer to every aspect of the game, and the way you play is - or should be - somewhat defined by the context in which a ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Two Fallacies

On the Playdiplomacy forum there are a number of topics about how Diplomacy should be played. There is often no agreement, and neither should there be. Diplomacy is played by people with different takes. Providing the rules of the game are followed, everything's good. Well, to some extent. https://darkjedibrotherhood.nyc3.digitaloceanspaces.com/assets/assets/000/000/678/original/keep-calm-and-play-the-game-10.png?1407803848 Personally, I think some of the philosophies behind how players act in a game are flawed. There is enough guidance out there, from the rules of the Diplomacy   to articles by the game's creator Allan B Calhamer , to show how the game ought to be played. The Rules "Object of the Game As soon as one Great Power controls 18 supply centers, it is considered to have gained control of Europe. The player representing that Great Power is the winner. However, players can end the game by agreement before a winner is determined. In this case...
Post a Comment
Read more